World War II in the Pacific: Causes and Consequences an Essay

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online World War II in the Pacific: Causes and Consequences an Essay file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with World War II in the Pacific: Causes and Consequences an Essay book. Happy reading World War II in the Pacific: Causes and Consequences an Essay Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF World War II in the Pacific: Causes and Consequences an Essay at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF World War II in the Pacific: Causes and Consequences an Essay Pocket Guide.

Hitler intended to invade Poland anyway, but first he had to neutralize the possibility that the Soviet Union would resist the invasion of its western neighbour. In a secret protocol of this pact, the Germans and the Soviets agreed that Poland should be divided between them, with the western third of the country going to Germany and the eastern two-thirds being taken over by the U.

Having achieved this cynical agreement, the other provisions of which stupefied Europe even without divulgence of the secret protocol, Hitler thought that Germany could attack Poland with no danger of Soviet or British intervention and gave orders for the invasion to start on August News of the signing, on August 25, of a formal treaty of mutual assistance between Great Britain and Poland to supersede a previous though temporary agreement caused him to postpone the start of hostilities for a few days. He was still determined, however, to ignore the diplomatic efforts of the western powers to restrain him.

Finally, at pm on August 31, , Hitler ordered hostilities against Poland to start at the next morning. The invasion began as ordered. In response, Great Britain and France declared war on Germany on September 3, at am and at pm , respectively. World War II had begun. You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser to improve your experience and security.

World War II. Article Media. Info Print Print. Table Of Contents. Submit Feedback. It destabilized the equilibrium of global inter-state relations. In the decades that followed the end of the Napoleonic Wars, Britain had enjoyed a position of virtually unchallenged supremacy. Its empire, based on naval power and vast colonial possessions, was the dominant fact of international politics in the nineteenth century.

  1. Reducing the Stress of Alzheimers Caregiving- Alzheimers Disease: Alzheimers Stress- Caregiving - Elder Care (Alzheimers Disease Tips You Should Know)?
  2. Navigation menu.
  3. Experiences of World War II Veterans.
  4. Haunted New York City: Ghosts and Strange Phenomena of the Big Apple (Haunted Series);
  5. World War II: The Pacific Islands;

As was commonly said of the British Empire, the sun never set and the wages never rose! France also enjoyed a privileged status in the world system as an old colonial power, but was considerably behind Britain. The emergence of new bourgeois national states, with rapidly expanding capitalist industry and finance, placed the existing geopolitical relations under stress. The entry of the United States into the imperialist club occurred in , when the McKinley administration, with unsurpassed cynicism, hypocrisy and dishonesty, concocted a pretext for war against Spain.

Within just a few months, Cuba was turned into a semi-colony of the United States. At the same time, the United States, through the occupation of the Philippines, established the foundations for its imperialist domination of the Pacific. Having justified its occupation of the Philippines with the promise of freedom and democracy for its inhabitants, the United States honored its commitments by slaughtering , local insurgents who opposed American occupation. The United States was blessed with a precious geographical advantage: a continent that was protected from foreign meddling by two oceans.

The growing ambitions of Germany, on the other hand, immediately collided with its imperialist neighbors in Europe—France, Russia, and, above all, Britain. The expanding conflicts of powerful national capitalist states, seeking dominance within an increasingly integrated global economy, formed the real basis for the accumulation of geopolitical tensions that finally exploded in the summer of Studied in isolation from broader historical circumstances, there is plenty of evidence that Germany and Austria-Hungary were principally responsible for the outbreak of war in August Their governments chose, with incredible recklessness, to exploit the assassination of Franz Ferdinand to achieve long-standing geopolitical objectives.

They took decisions that set into motion the disastrous chain of events that led to the outbreak of hostilities. It is true that France and Britain did not necessarily want war in August But that is not because they were devoted morally to peace. Britain, it should be remembered, had waged a brutal counter-insurgency war against the Boers in South Africa only a decade earlier.

However, when confronted with actions by Germany and Austria-Hungary that threatened the existing set-up and their interests, they accepted war as a political necessity. From the standpoint of the imperialist interests of France and Britain, war was preferable to a peace that changed the balance of power along lines sought by Germany.

In the final analysis, the cause of the war is not to be found in the actions of one or another state that precipitated the shooting, but in the nature of the imperialist system, in the struggle of powerful capitalist national states to maintain—or achieve, depending on the circumstances—a dominant position in an increasingly integrated global economic order. In the years preceding the war, the international socialist movement had held a series of congresses in which it had warned of the deadly consequences of developing imperialism and the militarism it encouraged.

The Second International, which had been founded in , declared again and again its unrelenting opposition to capitalist militarism and pledged to mobilize the working class against war. It warned the European ruling class that if war could not be stopped, the International would use the crisis created by war to hasten the overthrow of capitalism. But in August these pledges were betrayed by virtually all the leaders of European socialism. On August 4, , the German Social Democratic Party—the largest socialist party in the world—voted in the Reichstag for credits to finance the war.

The same patriotic position was taken by socialist leaders in France, Austria and Britain. Only a handful of major socialist leaders took a clear and unequivocal stand against the war, among whom the most important were Lenin, Trotsky and Rosa Luxemburg. I would like to focus briefly on the analysis made by Trotsky of the causes of the war. He rejected with contempt the deceitful and hypocritical claims of pro-war socialist leaders that they had sided with their capitalist rulers to defend their countries against foreign aggression.

World War II: Pearl Harbor & The Pacific War Essay

Trotsky exposed the blatant lies with which the warring governments sought to cover up the real political and economic motivations that underlay their decisions to go to war. He insisted that the cause of the war lay deeper, in changes in the structure of world economy and the very nature of the capitalist nation-state system. Forced to leave Austria with the outbreak of the war, Trotsky first went to Zurich, where, in , he wrote a brilliant pamphlet, War and the International , in which he explained the significance of the war. The present war is at bottom a revolt of the forces of production against the political form of nation and state.

It means the collapse of the national state as an independent economic unit.

The Aftermath of World War II: Collaboration & Retribution

The nation must continue to exist as a cultural, ideologic and psychological fact, but its economic foundation has been pulled from under its feet. All talk of the present bloody clash being the work of national defence is either hypocrisy or blindness.

Axis initiative and Allied reaction

On the contrary, the real, objective significance of the War is the breakdown of the present national economic centres, and the substitution of a world economy in its stead. The War proclaims the downfall of the national state. Yet at the same time it proclaims the downfall of the capitalist system of economy. By means of the national state, capitalism has revolutionized the whole economic system of the world. It has divided the whole earth among the oligarchies of the great powers, around which were grouped the satellites, the small nations, who lived off the rivalry between the great ones.

The future development of world economy on the capitalistic basis means a ceaseless struggle for new and ever new fields of capitalist exploitation, which must be obtained from one and the same source, the earth. The economic rivalry under the banner of militarism is accompanied by robbery and destruction which violate the elementary principles of human economy.

World production revolts not only against the confusion produced by national and state divisions but also against the capitalist economic organizations, which has now turned into barbarous disorganization and chaos. The War of is the most colossal breakdown in history of an economic system destroyed by its own inherent contradictions. Capitalism has created the material conditions of a new Socialist economic system.

Why Did Japan Attack Pearl Harbor? - HISTORY

Imperialism has led the capitalist nations into historic chaos. The War of shows the way out of this chaos by violently urging the proletariat on to the path of Revolution. This analysis was vindicated in the eruption of the Russian Revolution, which brought the Bolshevik party, led by Lenin and Trotsky, to power in October After four years of unprecedented conflict and bloodshed, the war ended somewhat abruptly in November What brought the war to an end was related more to changing political conditions within the belligerent countries than to results on the battlefield.

Only the infusion of American men and materiel on the side of the allies staved off military defeat and restored, at least to some extent, morale. Anti-war opposition grew rapidly in Germany, especially in the aftermath of the Bolshevik victory in Russia. In October , a naval mutiny in Germany triggered broader revolutionary protests that led to the abdication of Kaiser Wilhelm II.


Unable to continue the war, Germany sued for peace. Despite the defeat of Germany, the war did not produce the results that Britain and France had originally envisioned. In the east, the war had led to socialist revolution in Russia and the radicalization of the working class throughout Europe. In the west, the war created the conditions for the emergence of the United States—which had suffered relatively few losses—as the dominant capitalist power. The Versailles settlement of set the stage for the eruption of new conflicts. The vindictive terms insisted upon by French imperialism did little to ensure stable relations on the European continent.

The breakup of the Austro-Hungarian Empire resulted in the creation of a new set of unstable national states, torn by sectional rivalries. The Versailles settlement failed to create a foundation for the restoration of the political and economic equilibrium of Europe. Rather, the world capitalist economy, as it emerged from the war, was riven by imbalances that led to the unprecedented collapse that began on Wall Street in October Another major factor in the re-emergence of international tensions that was to lead to a renewal of global war in was the new role of the United States in world affairs.